Let me start with a declaration of unwavering support for
the Brock/Akil team and full disclosure of my general dislike of classic movie
remakes. When I initially heard about the
probability of the Sparkle remake, I
actually had high hopes for the project.
After all, it’s one of my favorite black films and I wanted a younger
generation to see and enjoy it. The
original casting choice of Aaliyah in the title role was brilliant. Her on screen persona was just as sweet,
petite, talented and bright as the original Sparkle, Irene Cara. It seemed like a remake that might actually
work, especially if the rewritten screenplay stayed close to Joel Schumacher’s
original story.
By the time I attended the press screening this past
Wednesday, my expectations for the film were significantly lower than they were
when I’d first learned of the project.
This classic film about a single mom, raising three beautiful, talented
daughters during our civil rights era, had already turned into something completely
different months before its release. It
had turned into Whitney Houston’s swan song, as her life had met a tragic end
shortly after the completion of the film. Whitney was also an icon from a
particular era of black entertainment.
She, too, will remain a classic. And
apparently, as one of the film’s producers, she decided against sticking with
certain details of the story—details that made Sparkle the gem that it has been since it’s 1976 debut.
In this almost totally brand new story, we see a single mom,
who is clearly well-off (not a
struggling domestic worker) and now living in a big house in the suburbs of
Detroit (instead of the two room apartment in Harlem), having no financial
issues raising her three daughters alone, a much stricter Christian than
originally written. While it is always
great to see upwardly mobile onscreen images of us, the story of Sparkle is rooted in this family’s
struggle, which is completely lost in the new version. This, along with the casting choices (which
I’ll elaborate on later) is troubling to me.
The struggle that originally drove Sister into the murderous hands of
Satin, Sparkle to choose secular music over the church choir and Delores to
deal with any of this show biz nonsense, is missing from this remade
version. Had I not seen the original
version, I wouldn’t be able to emotionally connect to these three girls and
their desire to be stars. The remake
feels like an incomplete story to me, leaving out a huge part of what it was
that made these characters who they were and what made them do what they do,
the way that they do it.
There were interesting casting choices as well, some of
which I did like quite a bit. The role
of the middle sister, Delores, played brilliantly by Tika Sumpter, was expanded
so that she was a fuller character than in the original film. That, I must say, was a pleasant
surprise. Tika took the role of the
strong, intelligent, confident sister to a new level and I loved it. Although this mom is totally different from
the character played by Mary Alice, Whitney Houston is very convincing as the
no nonsense matriarch of this family.
Derek Luke kept Stix just as charming as in the original and Mike Epps
actually humanized the despicable Satin Struthers. But the rest of the casting is questionable
for me.
Make no mistake—all of the cast members are eye candy give a good
performance with the material they had to work from. Unfortunately, the formerly lovable Levi does
not exist in this version. Instead,
Omari Hardwick was handed a character that initially appears to be simple
minded, unfocused and lost. This Levi
quickly becomes unlikeable and insignificant to the story, which is
disappointing because Levi was the catalyst for several developments in the
original. Equally distracting is the
gorgeous Carmen Ejogo, who was not a good casting choice for the role of
Sister. This is was painfully evident as
the camera pans Ejogo’s somewhat curve-less body during her sexually charged stage
performances. Much of Sister’s appeal to
her audience (both on the set and in the theater), and her men, was Lonette
McKee’s sassy, sensual curves, along with that beautiful face. The same moves that looked effortlessly sexy
on McKee ended up just looking desperate on Ejogo. I’m not critiquing Ejogo’s acting ability—she
is convincing as a troubled, confused young woman of the 60s. Casting her as Sister is simply a visual casting
faux pas. Visually, Jordin Sparks looks
more like the original Sister, much more than she bears any resemblance to
Sparkle.
Which brings me to little Ms. Jordin Sparks, who, I must
admit, didn’t do a bad acting job. If I
were simply listening to the film,
Jordin as Sparkle is very believable.
Visually, however, she, like Carmen, is not right for this role. The original Sparkle, was a tiny, olive
skinned, dreamy eyed girl, who was every bit the baby girl of the family. Her look, as well as the look of the other
two sisters, also silently spoke about the mom’s past relationships. Jordin
does not look like the baby of the family, though she is definitely a dreamy
eyed girl, nor does she look like the full sister of Delores. It is understandable though, that of these
three women, she would be the one cast as the singer because Jordin Sparks can
sing! The last moments of the film seem
to be a showcase for Jordin, as she powerfully belts out two original songs
using all of her vocal abilities.
Sparkle, though
filled with some insurmountable issues for me, does have many good points. The best thing about this film is the
soundtrack. Both the original and the
new songs drive the feel of this story.
There are memorable performances from both Whitney Houston and Jordin
Sparks. Ruth Carter absolutely worked
her costume design magic in this film. Additionally,
even with all of its obvious departures from the original story, the film still
sells the audience on the idea that if you stick to your dreams, stay focused
and do the right thing no matter what obstacles you face, everything you want
is achievable.
Sparkle will
certainly do well during this first weekend, particularly since it is being
billed as Whitney Houston’s final film performance. I would have enjoyed it more on the small
screen, perhaps as an HBO film. There
are sure to be nominations down the line from NAACP Image Awards, Golden Globe
Awards, SAG Awards, etc. There may even be
an Oscar nomination for the soundtrack and possibly costume design, both of
which would be well deserved.
I got exactly what I expected from this project. You will, too. Whatever the issues are, we now have another
dramatic story on the big screen, which adds to the black film community’s body
of work. I will continue to be a
Brock/Akil fan and supporter of black films.
But please look out for my list of DO NOT REMAKE films,
coming soon. We have enough original
stories of our own to bring to life.
Let’s focus on that, shall we?


Great review! You def make me want to see the original and I'll make sure to watch the new version with a grain of salt. I like your analysis of the film...more review please!
ReplyDeleteHow in the world did you get into my head??!! Every issue I had with this "re-do" ( not even close to a re-make) is what you wrote about!!! Aww, my big sis is smart!
ReplyDelete